By working directly with each distinct community, made up of people with a certain neurological variance, their families, supporters, and advocates, it is easier to gather different perspectives and address unmet needs. The community should be included in important decisions about their health, particularly in the early stages of clinical trial design to ensure research is designed to address unmet needs and in a way that encourages participation.
Caroline Averius, senior global patient partnership director, Roche
At Roche, this extends across Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Alzheimer’s disease, and autism, among others. Research is based on first-hand insights gathered from within these communities, which helps inform the initial stages of clinical trial design and drug development. Their voices need to be heard to understand the evolving needs of each therapeutic area, emerging expectations, and gaps they experience within their care.
The first step is recognising that, within many neurological conditions, the community is diverse. For clinical trials, this means that participants may have a range of needs that should be considered to develop truly inclusive research. Exploring these differences and celebrating nuances within the community requires a cultural shift – the pharmaceutical industry needs to embed inclusivity in all areas of the clinical trial process, from trial design and site selection to post-study communications.
Christine Eighteen, global patient partnership director, Roche
Making clinical trials participant-friendly isn’t always complicated and can often include small details that make the study participant feel valued and comfortable. For example, ensuring there is on-site parking, that the site selection is not intimidating, or that staff can answer difficult questions can help ease negative feelings towards clinical trials.
Being considerate of the correct language to use when communicating with different neurological communities is vital. Many communities do not consider themselves as patients. People at different stages of a condition may also have different outlooks and attitudes.
For example, within the Alzheimer’s community, people may have periods of wandering or forgetfulness, and may act differently depending on their mood and cognitive ability that day. This can make it harder to gain clear consent for somebody to take part in a trial. It is through close collaboration and in-depth discussion with the community that these potential issues can be addressed.
Alzheimer’s community representative
Whilst some considerations that need to be made are general and apply to all research design, there are specific considerations depending on the therapeutic area being studied and neuroscience is a highly complex field where the individual needs of each and every member of the community vary. Given this, Roche has been working with representatives across autism, Alzheimer’s, MS, and beyond to collaborate on a series of guidebooks for those designing clinical research, focused on improving the clinical trial experience.
Jannice Roeser, global patient partnership director, Roche
Co-created with the autism community, the Guidebook for Participant-Friendly Clinical Trials in autism highlights the diverse needs within the autism community, and how we can overcome or reduce the barriers participants face when taking part in a clinical trial. It provides both general and specific considerations for designing, conducting, and supporting participants in autism clinical trials.
Autism community representative
Built with the Finding Alzheimer’s Solutions Together (F.A.S.T) Council, it focuses on a range of considerations for the community and researchers. For example, it notes that people living with Alzheimer’s are heterogenous in terms of symptoms and cognitive ability. They are sometimes psychologically vulnerable and may act differently day-to-day depending on their mood or willingness to participate in everyday life.
It is therefore important to provide information about a clinical trial upfront and be transparent throughout the process, sharing information about the trial design and study drug’s mode of action in a way that is easy to understand. Study partners, who often do not know which challenge they will face from one day to the next, should be given clear expectations regarding their attendance during a trial and receive detailed information.
Stephanie Ludwig, global patient partnership chapter lead, neuroscience, Roche
Co-created tools like these can pave the way for more successful research in clinical trials. It’s up to pharmaceutical companies to embed community perspectives and insights into their core decision making. It is through these community insights that they will be able to deliver a truly personalised approach to neurological care.